Toronto Team  

  • T416.203.0067
  • 1.866.242.0203
  • F416.203.0544
  • 8 Wellington Street East
    3rd Floor
  • Toronto, Ontario M5E 1C5

Asset Location: Tax Savings Through More Organized Living

Among the most common questions I receive from blog readers is: “How do I tax-efficiently manage an ETF portfolio across various account types?” This question relates to asset location – or which asset classes should end up in which accounts. This is not to be confused with asset allocation, which is how much of your portfolio to allocate to each asset class.

If that’s still a little confusing, think of the assets in your portfolio as being like the hours in your day. You may allocate eight hours each to working, playing and resting. You’ll also locate each hour in a place most appropriate for the activity – such as a dark, quiet room when it’s time to sleep. Similarly, you may allocate 40% of your assets to fixed income and 60% to equity, but you’ll locate these holdings where you’ll get the most tax-efficient bang for the buck.

Big picture, that means you want to consider the tax efficiency of each type of holding, based on its potentially taxable annual interest or dividends, as well as its potentially taxable eventual capital growth through the years. (At least we hope your holdings grow!) You then locate each holding where both types of tax ramifications are expected to cause the least overall damage done.  

So how does that work?

First, a few ground rules. In the scenarios that follow, I’ll assume a 40% fixed income/60% equity asset allocation. Since most investors are managing a similarly balanced/rebalanced portfolio, this practical model strikes me as a happy medium between ignoring the potential tax-saving benefits of asset location, versus taking the calculations to an extreme.

If you really wanted to sharpen your pencil, some might suggest using the less-traditional, but more complex after-tax approach for calculating optimal asset locations. Since asset location is always a best-estimate effort (with THE best answer only available in hindsight), it seems to me that the law of diminishing returns begins to apply.

Let’s get started!

Scenario 1: All assets in RRSP accounts

This is the most basic situation. Obviously, if you only have one type of location in which to invest your assets, your choice of location is pretty easy. It’s like living in a one-room house. The only way to make the portfolio slightly more tax-efficient is to swap out the Canadian-listed foreign equity ETFs for their US-listed counterparts (using Norbert’s gambit to convert your loonies to dollars).

Scenario 2: Assets are split between TFSA and RRSP accounts

In this situation, you and your spouse have assets in both TFSA and RRSP accounts. As all growth and dividends that accumulate in a TFSA account are never taxed (even upon withdrawal), investments with the highest expected returns should be held here first.

That makes equities the obvious choice for the TFSA account. Unfortunately, we have no idea which equity region will outperform moving forward. As a personal preference, I choose to hold Canadian, U.S., and international/emerging markets equities evenly, to mitigate my regret if I otherwise managed to choose the worst outcome. Feel free to adjust this allocation if you would rather roll the dice.

Don’t bother holding US-listed foreign equity ETFs in your TFSA accounts – this does nothing to mitigate foreign withholding taxes.

Scenario 3: All equities fit into TFSA and taxable accounts

Once you’ve maxed out your TFSAs with equities, your taxable accounts are usually the next best location if you have more equities (since only 50% of capital gains are taxable there). You may also stumble across tax-loss selling opportunities in your taxable accounts, which could help you defer future capital gains taxes when rebalancing your portfolio.

Scenario 4: Fixed income has spilled over into the taxable account

Your portfolio is looking great and you’re on the right track. Just don’t blow it by holding tax-inefficient fixed income products in your taxable account. As I’ve written about in the past, most bond ETFs are not ideal candidates for taxable investing (due to the higher coupon payments of the underlying bonds). The BMO Discount Bond Index ETF (ZDB) attempts to mitigate this issue by investing in lower coupon bonds. As you can see in the chart below, the taxes paid on a $10,000 taxable investment were substantially less for ZDB vs. the BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG).

2016 taxes payable on a $10,000 investment (Ontario taxpayer in the top marginal tax bracket)

Exchange-Traded Fund Asset Class Total Taxes Paid (2016)
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG) Canadian Bonds $150
BMO Discount Bond Index ETF (ZDB) Canadian Bonds $103

Sources: CDS Innovations Inc. Tax Breakdown Service, BMO ETFs


Scenario 5: RRSP accounts must still hold some equities

What if you can’t fit all of your equities into your TFSA and taxable accounts? Generally, if you must hold some equities in your RRSP accounts, opt for international equities. With their fully taxable and juicy dividend yield of around 3%, the taxes payable each year will take their toll. In the chart below, I’ve shown the taxes paid by an Ontario resident in the top tax bracket during the 2016 tax year for a $10,000 investment in each equity ETF. As you can see, holding international equities resulted in higher taxes payable during the year than any of the other equity regions.

This is also a good example of when it makes sense to build a 5-ETF rather than a 3-ETF portfolio. Holding a global equity ETF (such as the iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW)) would not allow you to isolate the less-tax-efficient international equities, so you could locate them within your RRSP account. Breaking up the ETF into its underlying U.S., international and emerging markets components provides more flexibility in this situation.

Depending on where you live in Canada (and your actual tax rate), prioritizing the asset location order for remaining equity asset classes could differ from the results below. Next week, we’ll take a closer look at that.

2016 taxes payable on a $10,000 investment (Ontario taxpayer in the top marginal tax bracket)

Exchange-Traded Fund Asset Class Total Taxes Paid (2016)
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN) Canadian Equities $109
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU) U.S. Equities $103
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) International Equities $146
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI Index ETF (XEC) Emerging Markets Equities $112

Sources: CDS Innovations Inc. Tax Breakdown Service, BlackRock Canada, Vanguard Canada


By: Justin Bender | 0 comments

Corporate Taxation: The Magical Dividend Refund

I’ll be the first to admit, there are times when the way our tax codes play out seems more like magic than accounting – especially when integrating your personal and corporate taxes. “Look, nothing up my sleeves,” says your tax professional. Can you believe it? That’s what this series is for: Putting some of the acts into slow-mo, so you can see the sleight of hand for yourself.

Today, we’ll talk about the magical dividend refund, whose purpose is to ensure that corporate shareholders don’t end up being unfairly taxed twice on the same income. Ready to see how this nifty trick works?

In my last blog post, I showed how Canadian interest income is taxed within a corporation. In our example, an Ontario-based corporation was taxed 50.17%, or $5,017 on $10,000 of Canadian interest income. This left $4,983 of after-tax income to reinvest in the corporation’s passive portfolio or to distribute to shareholders.

Let’s say this money were distributed to you, a shareholder and Ontario taxpayer. If there were no further adjustments, you’d then incur an additional $2,258 of personal taxes on the non-eligible dividend. (Trust me on that figure, and I’ll spare you the details so we can get to the good stuff.)

If you’re keeping an eye on the action, you can see how unfair this would be. Your combined corporate and personal taxes would be $7,275, for an effective tax rate of 72.75%. That’s considerably higher than Ontario’s top personal tax rate of 53.53%.

A Part 1 corporate tax disappearing act

The government is well aware of this inconsistency, so they rightfully allow your corporation to “disappear” a portion of your otherwise unequal burden by obtaining a dividend refund when taxable dividends are paid out to shareholders. Specifically, we apply a bit of pixie dust to the federal 38.67% Part I tax payable on investment income to position your corporation to qualify for a refund on 30.67% of the aggregate investment income from Schedule 7. In our example, that’s $10,000 × 30.67% = $3,067.

The remaining 8% of the 38.67% federal Part I tax is non-refundable, as are provincial and territorial taxes like Ontario’s 11.5% tax.

Source: Corporate Taxprep – T2 Corporation Income Tax Return (2016)


Refundable dividend tax on hand (RDTOH)

We’re not yet done with the fancy footwork. There’s also the ever-so-catchy refundable dividend tax on hand (RDTOH) account, where the available dividend refund described above accumulates.

To obtain the full dividend refund available, the corporation must pay out a taxable dividend of sufficient size to shareholders. The corporation is refunded 38.33% of each dollar of taxable dividends it distributes to shareholders. So in our example, a business owner would need to pay out taxable dividends of at least $8,002 to reclaim the full $3,067 of refundable taxes available in the RDTOH account balance ($3,067 ÷ 38.33%). This refunded amount of taxes is the actual dividend refund.

Source: Corporate Taxprep – T2 Corporation Income Tax Return (2016)


The Dividend Refund

As mentioned in the discussion above, the corporation will have $8,050 available to distribute to its shareholders (once you include the dividend refund of $3,067 and the after-tax corporate income of $4,983). As this amount is higher than the required $8,002, we’ll have no issues receiving the full dividend refund.

To pay out the taxable dividends to shareholders, the business owner would include $8,050 of taxable dividends on Schedule 3 (line 450). This figure would feed through to the dividend refund section of the corporate tax return, resulting in a dividend refund of $3,067.

If you’re watching closely, you may notice that the $8,050 dividend payment should generate a dividend refund of $3,086 ($8,050 × 38.33%). But only $3,067 is actually refunded, since this is the balance available in the RDTOH account.

Source: Corporate Taxprep – Schedule 3 (2016)


Source: Corporate Taxprep – T2 Corporation Income Tax Return (2016)


Did you follow all that? Below is the summary.

Next week, we’ll look at how tax integration works (or doesn’t) with Canadian interest income. We’ll also look at whether it makes sense to retain the investment income within the corporation for reinvestment, or dividend it out to the shareholders.

General Formula Amount Calculation
Canadian interest income $10,000  
Part I tax – non-refundable
($800) $10,000 × 8%
Part I tax - refundable
($3,067) $10,000 × 30.67%
Provincial or territorial tax – non-refundable
($1,150) $10,000 × 11.5% (Ontario)
After-tax corporate income
$4,983 $10,000 - $800 - $3,067 - $1,150
Dividend refund
$3,067 $10,000 × 30.67%
Amount available to distribute as a taxable dividend
$8,050 $4,983 + $3,067


By: Justin Bender | 0 comments