Behavioural Finance

I visited my sister in the UK last summer and spent time with my young nieces and nephews. One evening, we found a compendium of board games and I introduced my five-year-old nephew to Snakes and Ladders. The rules were explained, although not completely absorbed, and off we started.

Academics are fascinated by the way you invest. You shouldn’t be flattered by their interest. They engage in sophisticated analysis in an effort to explain why you invest in a way that so irrational. The underlying premise of their studies is that your investing behavior makes no sense.

Investors engage in very curious behavior. It’s increasingly difficult to understand why this occurs. Here are some examples:

The rapid rise in price of Bitcoin has generated intense speculation about the future of cryptocurrencies. It’s instructive to take a closer look at some of the commentary about the future price of Bitcoin, because it tells you a lot about speculation, investing and financial journalism.

Over the years, I’ve written extensively on how to invest intelligently and responsibly, based on sound, peer-reviewed evidence. Together with many others, I’ve extolled the virtues of low management fee index funds, global diversification, keeping costs and fees as low as possible and avoiding or deferring taxes.

For many years, I’ve viewed the behavior of most investors as inexplicable. Here’s a summary of their bad choices.

Are the markets up, down or all around today? Regardless, there’s never a bad time to consider these two “No Dumb Questions”: What should you do if we’re in a bear market … and what can you do to prepare for the next one?

In my last video, I talked about some of the challenges that active managers face in outperforming the market. It boils down to their relatively high fees, and intense competition from other managers.

The data is in and, for fund managers who are still trying to “beat” the market, the numbers are still not on their side. As talented as active players often are at slicing and dicing the data, and as mightily as they may try, there’s considerable evidence that passive players continue to have the last laugh. Why is that? As usual, it has a lot to do with common sense.

Until recently, it was frustrating trying to convince you to become an evidence-based investor. Part of the problem was persuading you that brokers and self-appointed stock market gurus are emperors with no clothes. There’s no credible evidence anyone has the expertise to reliably and consistently pick outperforming stocks, tell you when to get in and out of the market or pick the next “hot” mutual fund manager.